četrtek, 06. december 2007
As Cover (2006) suggests and deeply analyses in his article, the traditional author-text-audience relationship is being redefined, for now the audiences have a great capacity to change, alter and manipulate a text. At some point he refers to such advanced interactivity as a struggle for control over the authorial “purity” and “aunthenticity” of the text and even as a war between media creators/industries and audience participation. I do agree that the questions of authorship, audiences and text may represent a problem in the development of these new media technologies (and consequently in our society) and that we have to find some regulations and solutions in order to prevent it getting completely out of hands but at the same time I dare to say that in my opinion Cover’s fear might be a little bit exaggerated.
I do not deny the fact that nowadays it is possible for everybody to express their views and opinions, to share their beliefs, give non-mainstream voices (which is often anything but negative), participate in a public debate (Gauntlett, 2004) ... We could even say that in a way we are now being part of a global public sphere which not only enables us to publish whatever we have to say but also to consume whatever everyone else have to say. That, however, means that suddenly we find ourselves in a chaos of information and that another problem might occur elsewhere than Cover was suggesting. He did not take into the consideration the scarce and the most valuable resourse in the new era, which everybody on the web is struggling for - attention (Goldhaber in Gauntlett 2004). As Schultz (2000) suggests: “The greater the number of communicators, the less time everyone has to listen to others; the smaller the size of interacting groups, the smaller their significance for society as a whole”. He continues with a thought that with a growing number of information and communication forums, some central sources may become more important. I do agree with Cover that the empowerment of audience represents a threat to media industries and to existing institutions but I also think that we have to look at the problem from a broader point of view. In this aspect, I find the following thought of Schultz (2000) quite meaningful: “Communication and participation alone do not mean much in terms of quality and value of content. Also, communication can remain without any significant effects as long as it is not transformed into communicative power and effective decisions”.
- Gauntlett, D. (2004). Introduction. D. Gauntlett, R. Horsley: Web.Studies, 2nd Edition. London: Hodder Arnold
- Cover, R. (2004). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media & Society, 8(1): 139–158.
- Schultz, T. (2000). mass media and the concept of interactivity: an exploratoty studiy of online forums and reader email. Media, Culture&Society, vol. 22: 205-221.
Comparison of the two approaches made by Silver and Gauntlett
Gauntlett’s Web Studies however, is a real contrast to all the theoretical, sometimes, over theorized writing. The author switches from the strict academic writing to a more popular style that can be understood by anyone who wants to find out how the web shapes and modifies society. The book focuses on practical examples from the real life and “is designed to address a cross-section of interesting cultural and social things happening on the net”. As Gauntlett puts it: “New media would be nothing if it wasn’t meaningful to people…” And indeed, he tries to deal with the issues that can and should be understood by everyday people who use the internet on a regular basis or are just trying to understand how powerful the new media are in our society by explaining us some of the main issues concerning the web. He presents the possibilities that are offered to us by the internet and encourages us to use them in a practical and creative sense, such as participating in online political debates or in any public discussions for that matter. I find it very useful that the author also presents some basics of the web and so tries to draw attention of the broader public, also with providing some useful websides. The book is very varied, it provides a wide range of topics, from arts and culture, web business, web communities, politics and international relations … The only thing I personally miss in the book is maybe some thoughts about online advertising because I think it’s an interesting field to discuss in the light of web studies and also in my opinion it’s role in the society is not so insignificant.
- Silver, D. (2006). Introduction: Where is Internet Studies? Critical Cyberculture Studies, 1-14. New York: New York University Press.
- Gauntlett, D. (2004). Introduction. D. Gauntlett, R. Horsley: Web.Studies, 2nd Edition. London: Hodder Arnold.
četrtek, 29. november 2007
New media and me
I must laugh at those times now, for a day doesn't go by that I don't ckeck my inbox at least twice a day and write at least a couple of emails. On a daily basis I use search engines for all sort of information, I read online newspapers, use digital libraries and other resources, read other people's blogs (so far I have been to lazy to set up one of my own), participate in online forums, every once in a while I make a purchase online and I almost always buy plane tickets (and other tickets if possible) online ... not to mention that I practically conduct another, virtual life when using (daily) Facebook, MSN and Skype (which in my opinion can be a real life savior!) ... which is terrific because thanks to these new technologies I am able to stay in touch with so many people from all around the world and suddenly everything and everybody seems so close ... As Thomas L. Friedman put it, the world is flat!
Naročite se na Objave [Atom]